Re: Paris 32x16
Posted: 28.07.2012, 09:06
Finde das ganze ziemlich verschwommen und somit eher unschön.. es fehlt einfach schärfe!
Your place for everything around CreepTD.
http://www.creeptd.com/forums/
Pezinator wrote:Nope I agree with Index. Although it's getting better it's defintely not perfect yet
Pezinator wrote:There are lot's of maps far away from being perfect. Actually I don't think there is any really perfect map!
I still don't really like the river, although you made it better and again it's not sharp enough. If it would be possible to sharpen paris magic a bit and improve the river a bit. I'd be happy.
Pezinator wrote:I undestand you. You would be happy if the map would be added. So would I, by the way. I hope you don't missunderstand me. I would immediately play the map. I like the path I like the idea and I like the design. I wouldn't be angry if the map would be added. I just said that there are some things that in my eyes could be better. But as you said propably every map has something that could be improved and moreover not everybody likes the same.
In the end it is your map, I just told you my opinion. It is up to you if you think I am right or if you like your version more. If you're happy with your map. I accept this. I will play the map either way.
dcode wrote:Sharpened - but because of the bad initial image material, it's not convincing me either. Imho it better should look more like painted art than an actual satellite image.
If not self-painted in pixel art, it will never have the quality of NYC, though.
dcode wrote:I am completely on your side! Just tried to put some more examples into the discussion to make it easier to finally find a decision everyone feels comfortable with. With "painted art" I refered to your new version of the map.
dcode wrote:Maybe...
dcode wrote:I must have missed that, it's featured now